“The Fine Print”, by Michael Schrader

 

WE DON’T DESERVE THIS EMBARRASSMENT

 

 

(Written and posted 16 July 2009)

 

 

When I lived in Arkansas, I thought that Arkansas had the most colorful political culture of any state in the Union.  What other state had a municipal secession?  (North Little Rock from Little Rock)  What other state had one city’s version of animal control being dumping the boogers in the neighboring town? (As retribution for seceding, Little Rock would dump its strays in North Little Rock, derisively dubbed “Dogtown”.)  What other state had to have military escorts for high school students? (Central High crisis….)  What other state has glass in the gallery of the capitol to prevent citizens from pelting their legislators with rocks and garbage?  What other state had Clinton and the Hutchinson brothers?  What other had had its governor living in a triple wide?

 

Yup, Arkansas is a very colorful place.  I remember a small town mayor getting shot because he was mistaken for a squirrel (I still don’t understand why he was in a tree during squirrel season).  I remember another small town where the mayor would drive down the main street giving his opponents the bird.  I remember that “Sweet, Sweet Connie”, the groupie made famous in the song “We’re An American Band”, ran for mayor of Little Rock.  (She would be spotted at town hall meetings drunk and el commando….)

 

However, as colorful as Arkansas is, it pails to Oklahoma.  When I first moved here going on seven years ago, a friend of mine commented that Oklahoma has the worst political leadership, hands down, of any state in the Union, including Louisiana.  One thing that Arkansas could always feel good about was that no matter how bad it was, it was always better than Louisiana.  After seven years in the Sooner State, I must reluctantly agree with my friend, that Louisiana is better.  Both states have produced numerous enigmatic politicians over the years.  The difference is in Louisiana, they were intentionally so.

 

The enigma that is the typical Oklahoma politician can first be found before statehood.  One of the movers and shakers who pushed hard for Oklahoma statehood was “Alfalfa” Bill Murray.  If you don’t know who “Alfalfa” Bill is, he is the famous Oklahoma governor who declared war on Texas over that state’s refusal to open a free bridge across the Red River.  There is a famous photograph of Alfalfa Bill standing on the bridge with the uniformed national guard behind him.  He was very popular with Okies but very unpopular with FDR, and when your state is in the throes of a Depression and need some help from the Feds, that dose not bode well for your state.  At all.  In just over one hundred years of statehood, we’ve had more than one governor thrown out of office.  We had another chastise citizens for not electing his wife to Congress.  I won’t even mention the longstanding blood feuds.

 

It doesn’t stop with the chief executive.  We are a state that had oil wells on our capitol grounds, but didn’t finish the building for almost a hundred years.  We are a state whose capital city stole (Oklahoma City) the seat of government from another city (Guthrie) by clandestine means.  We have a state that used to be two very different territories (Indian and Oklahoma) that were forced to become one in a shotgun wedding presided over by the federal government.  We have a state whose two largest cities, Tulsa and Oklahoma City, well, despise each other.  We are a state with two sovereign, separate governments. (The government of the State of Oklahoma and the tribal governments, who do not have to answer to the state government.)

 

Oklahoma ranks in the bottom ten in education, income, health, two-parent households.  We have roads so bad, that in some places you can see through the bridge decks.  We had an accident in Tulsa a couple of years ago where a driver hit a pot hole that was so big, it caused her to lose control and she flipped off a bridge onto another car.  Oklahoma was the forty-sixth state to join the Union, and it ranks about forty-sixth in just about every category.  You’d think that with so much improvement needed, that our legislators and local politicians wouldn’t have time for anything else.  But, this is Oklahoma.

 

No, instead of worrying about improving our education, our health, our roads, our politicians are tackling the big issues like designating the watermelon as the state vegetable and trying to ban the use of paper napkins at barbeque restaurants.  We have an exceptionally high number of divorces and single-parent households.  We have counties where just about one in four families are considered poor.  We have counties where you have to drive out of the county to get a livable wage.  We have a road system where all of the “good” highways are tolled.  We have an educational system where the most important thing is winning the state football championship.  (We have one high school whose stadium seats over 10000 people.)  We have a huge meth problem in those areas where hopelessness is endemic.  And how is our wise Legislature dealing with these problems?

 

By cutting taxes.  The solution to everything is to cut taxes.  But wait, there’s more.  The solution to every problem is to cut taxes and reaffirm our Christian values.  We have a legislator who is on a crusade against libraries, because one local library had a book about a gay couple that she found offensive.  After all, the gay lifestyle is the reason why the roads are bad.  It couldn’t be that these wackos keep cutting taxes and there isn’t any money to fix the roads; no, it’s because of the gays.  This same legislator now wants every Oklahoman to sign a morality oath affirming that they are God-fearing Christian people who believe that marriage is between a man and a woman and is forever whenever they get their driver’s license.  I guess because my marriage didn’t last forever, I have suddenly become a bad driver and should no longer be permitted to driver.  The big debate in this past legislative session wasn’t about how to reduce poverty or improve education; that’s piddling and unimportant stuff.  No, the big issue is whether or not to put a monument to the Ten Commandments on the capitol grounds.

 

Study after study shows that financial insecurity is a big reason why couples get divorced.  I am no exception.  Throughout my marriage, my ex was always stressed about money and financial security; she was so stressed that she would take unnecessary risks to eliminate that insecurity, which always resulted in further insecurity.  As this cycle spiraled viciously downward, it eventually broke our marriage, as I didn’t understand her stress and she didn’t understand why I didn’t understand.  It seems logical to me that since financial security is a big reason why people get divorced, that if you make people more financially secure, then there will be fewer divorces.  But, this is Oklahoma, and logic isn’t welcome here.  Our Legislature’s solution to the high rate of divorce?  A minimum waiting period of 90 days from when the divorce is filed to when it is final, so that couples can kiss and make up and work out their problems.  (Let me clarify that this only applies to people with children, as divorce is bad for children. Or so they say.)  While some people file for divorce in a fit of passion, most do not, and have agonized over the decision for months.  If financial stress is the reason for the divorce, how is waiting 90 days going to resolve that?  Unless that 90 days comes with a sizable financial infusion, it doesn’t.  (Thanks to the constant tax cuts, there’s no money left for an infusion, even if the Legislature wanted to give one.)  In fact, it acerbates the problem, as it forces the divorcing spouses into a financial limbo where their assets are frozen and unusable.  

 

Oklahomans have major statewide elections on the horizon in 2010.  Since our governor is term limited, we will have a new governor.  More than likely, we will have other new statewide officials, too.  Oklahomans have a choice to make – keep electing the same colorful cast of characters who say the “right” things but accomplish nothing, or elect some new faces who don’t resort to base demagoguery and who are willing to make the tough choices to improve our state.  I like tax cuts just like the next person, and in many cases, tax cuts are the right choice.  But they are not the solution for everything.  Tough times call for tough choices.

 

Enough with the demagogues! After one hundred years, it has gotten old, and harmed our state.  I will not vote for any candidate who does not provide thoughtful solutions to our problems.  Just banning this and banning that and cutting taxes and being a good Christian isn’t enough.  Any candidate who uses the words “God” “Christian” “conservative” “morals” will not get my vote, as those are words, not solutions.  Electing leaders based on rhetoric is not a way to run a government.   We’ve had our one hundred years of snake oil.  We deserve better.

 

 

Back to “The Fine Print” Index