(Written 29 July 1998. Published in the Neighborhood Journal. Posted 06 July 2009.)
Some will tell you that reputation doesn't matter. You know, we shouldn't judge a book by the
cover. And while I agree that reputation
shouldn't matter, it does matter. That
is just the way it is.
It is amazing to me how much destruction a rumor can do to a
life. Take, for example, that prosecutor
in
Cities are very similar to people in that respect. Rumors can so affect a city's reputation that
it may never recover.
I am afraid that unless things start changing soon, Cabot
may join the Rock as a city with a tarnished reputation. This is a tragedy for all of those people in
Cabot who are working outside of the spotlight to truly make Cabot a better
community. In talking to people
throughout
I know that what is said is not true of the majority of the
people in Cabot. However, the majority
do not hog the spotlight. It's the
minority in the spotlight who are tarnishing the city's name.
For example, when prominent city "V.I.P.s"
brag about the lack of minorities, then attribute this to quality of life, just
how do you suppose someone else is going to view this? Not positively. Or how about bragging about how your kids are
somehow better than, you know, those "other" kids when, in reality,
your kids are exposed to the same kind of influences, from promiscuity to
alcohol to drugs, as the "other" bad kids? I have talked to enough kids in Cabot to know
that, behind the veneer of sainthood, the kids in Cabot aren't any different
than kids in any other place in the country.
After all, a teenager is a teenager, period, whether from
When the top official of a city has nothing better to do
than harass a developer who has followed the law, how does that make the city
look? Throw in the fact that this
development is outside the city, and thus outside the jurisdiction of the city
of
How about a top city official who admitted to the newspaper
that he violated the city's own personnel policy in terminating a city
employee, but that it did not matter because he had the right to fire "at
will"? Oh, did I mention that the
employee heard from the newspaper that he had been canned before he heard it
from the city? How does this make Cabot
look?
How about a city who tells a builder building on a hill that
he is in a flood plain and cannot build, but yet allows other builders to fill
in flood plains and low spots at will?
And, on top of that, told the builder that, in order to build, he has to
guarantee that no house will ever flood?
Gee, did the builders of Diamond Creek have to make such a promise? Ask the homeowners who had to sandbag and
were callously ignored by the city.
It is not too late.
There is still time to show the world that this is not Cabot. Or is it?
Back to “The Fine Print” Index